audio7/10/13 IAN MASTERS & SARAH SLAYMAN so hypocritical, think they r "...

PREJUDICE KEYWORDS of IAN MASTERS: "these people" (ie conservatives) at 00:13,
"most reasonable people" (ie as compared to conservatives against abortion)  at 00:19
"fanaticism" (ie only "fanatics" want to protect unborn life) at 00:23
"combined with greed" ((?? how is protecting unborn life about "greed"?) also at 00:23
"what about real Christians...I mean genuine Christians" (01:58 )
"Jesus Christ did not carry an assault rifle...02:04 (what does an assault rifle have to do with protecting unborn life ?!
"...no abortion passage in the Bible..." 02:10 (maybe because there was never any consideration of killing an unborn baby at that time in history. Nonetheless, I suggest "Thou shall not kill" covers it quite well)
"real Christians versus Jihadi Christians ( at 02:15
ie any Christian who wants to protect unborn life is a "radical" like a terrorist according to Ian. This is such irresponsible "journalism" its reprehensible. He should be fired
***
audio7/10/13 IAN MASTERS & SARAH SLAYMAN so hypocritical, think they r "real Christians"...listen to ian talk about "real Christians" at one point..apparently meaning only those who are are pro-choice can be "real Christians" .also see video link below... This is a disgusting show of disrespect by sarah slayman. she deserved to be removed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTqh7xNdrqM&feature=youtube_gdata_player
(at above link) Sarah Slayman is removed from the texas chamber for abusive language & conduct,...yet you wouldn't know it if you read the liberal reports, or if you listen to ian masters on kpfk
read a liberal report at http://ncnc.newsvine.com/_news/2013/07/09/19380531-no-free-speech-rights-in-texas-woman-dragged-from-chamber
"Ian Masters is an Australian-born, BBC-trained American broadcast journalist, commentator, author, screenwriter and documentary filmmaker."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Masters_(journalist)
**************
the ANSWER is simple! it's called ADOPTION! Can we at least ask women to "put up with" nine months of carrying a baby for the sake of adoption? Or Is it too much of an inconvenience ?